<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Search for Lightest Antivirus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://djitz.com/reviews/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://djitz.com/reviews/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/</link>
	<description>Giving Positive Impact On People's Lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:35:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: djitz</title>
		<link>http://djitz.com/reviews/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>djitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djitz.com/2008/04/23/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>chronoboi,
I agree with you that the AVG 8.5 is far heavier than its 7.5 predecessor.

However, during the latest test it was still lighter than Avast.

Anyway, you can read my latest test for lightest anti virus in year 2009. Please kindly give me other comment about it if you have any. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chronoboi,<br />
I agree with you that the AVG 8.5 is far heavier than its 7.5 predecessor.</p>
<p>However, during the latest test it was still lighter than Avast.</p>
<p>Anyway, you can read my latest test for lightest anti virus in year 2009. Please kindly give me other comment about it if you have any. <img src='http://djitz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightest Free Antivirus 2009 Review &#8212; djitz.com</title>
		<link>http://djitz.com/reviews/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightest Free Antivirus 2009 Review &#8212; djitz.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djitz.com/2008/04/23/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] was two years after my first article about the lightest antivirus and there are hundreds of hits to it. I believe it means that there are so many people who are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was two years after my first article about the lightest antivirus and there are hundreds of hits to it. I believe it means that there are so many people who are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chronoboi</title>
		<link>http://djitz.com/reviews/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>chronoboi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djitz.com/2008/04/23/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>No offense but.. as of now (Feb. 2009).. avg has turned out to be one of the heaviest anti virus..

As of now, NOD32, Avira &amp; Avast! are fighting over for the lightest..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense but.. as of now (Feb. 2009).. avg has turned out to be one of the heaviest anti virus..</p>
<p>As of now, NOD32, Avira &amp; Avast! are fighting over for the lightest..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://djitz.com/reviews/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djitz.com/2008/04/23/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Riki, I use AVG Free Version 7 when I wrote this post and I think you are right, the AVG version 8.0 consumes more resources now.

I will post an update post about the lightest anti virus in 2008, and this time AVG is no longer the best I guess. Now I&#039;m using Avira Antivir and so far I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riki, I use AVG Free Version 7 when I wrote this post and I think you are right, the AVG version 8.0 consumes more resources now.</p>
<p>I will post an update post about the lightest anti virus in 2008, and this time AVG is no longer the best I guess. Now I&#8217;m using Avira Antivir and so far I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riki</title>
		<link>http://djitz.com/reviews/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Riki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djitz.com/2008/04/23/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Which AVG Free that you use? Is it version 7.5  or 8.0? coz i&#039;m using 8.0 and I think it is more resource hungry than the previous one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which AVG Free that you use? Is it version 7.5  or 8.0? coz i&#8217;m using 8.0 and I think it is more resource hungry than the previous one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonnyxx</title>
		<link>http://djitz.com/reviews/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>sonnyxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djitz.com/2008/04/23/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>yah.. what uve said is right.. avg is a user friendly antivirus with its offline update that makes it a good one specially for those who dont have an internet in their home to update. but for me nod32 is the one i recomend if you have an internet connection in your place because its heuristic analysis in detecting viruses compare to avg is more accurate. thnx for reading...from trix aka wilson..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yah.. what uve said is right.. avg is a user friendly antivirus with its offline update that makes it a good one specially for those who dont have an internet in their home to update. but for me nod32 is the one i recomend if you have an internet connection in your place because its heuristic analysis in detecting viruses compare to avg is more accurate. thnx for reading&#8230;from trix aka wilson..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Woodall</title>
		<link>http://djitz.com/reviews/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Woodall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djitz.com/2008/04/23/the-search-for-lightest-antivirus/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Great Post!
I used Avast for years on my XP machines with great results.
My wife used AVG for years but recently switched to Avast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!<br />
I used Avast for years on my XP machines with great results.<br />
My wife used AVG for years but recently switched to Avast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
